<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Egalitaria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>::  speak up :: judge fairly :: defend the needy ::</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on About Egalitaria by oyster cove</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/about/#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>oyster cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/about/#comment-4407</guid>
		<description>Hi Tricia,

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tricia,</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scary Similarities: Malaysia &#38; South Africa by oyster cove</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/scary-similarities-malaysia-south-africa/#comment-4406</link>
		<dc:creator>oyster cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/?p=362#comment-4406</guid>
		<description>Do you know that before 1994, South Africa had apartheid policy. It discriminate the black to white supremacy. Malaysia was the biggest supporter of anti-apartheid policy during the period. This are the reasons why they adopted Malaysia NEP policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know that before 1994, South Africa had apartheid policy. It discriminate the black to white supremacy. Malaysia was the biggest supporter of anti-apartheid policy during the period. This are the reasons why they adopted Malaysia NEP policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scheibenkleister by Pat Fisher</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/scheibenkleister-2/#comment-4405</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/scheibenkleister-2/#comment-4405</guid>
		<description>I'm going to e-mail your information about my one and only 'swear' word to my
German ex-husband who always insisted that Scheibenkleister had no meaning.
I just love the sound of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to e-mail your information about my one and only &#8217;swear&#8217; word to my<br />
German ex-husband who always insisted that Scheibenkleister had no meaning.<br />
I just love the sound of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Allah, Tuhan, God, Shang-Ti, Dio! by samantha</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/allah-tuhan-god-shang-ti-dio/#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/allah-tuhan-god-shang-ti-dio/#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>for all the christians, let us pray in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. He already said we can ask the FATHER anything by using His name. Peace be with you all. GOD bless you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for all the christians, let us pray in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. He already said we can ask the FATHER anything by using His name. Peace be with you all. GOD bless you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Allah, Tuhan, God, Shang-Ti, Dio! by samantha</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/allah-tuhan-god-shang-ti-dio/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/allah-tuhan-god-shang-ti-dio/#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>GOD's name is holy. treat HIS name with respect and avoid yourself from getting into useless arguments. HIS name is very sacred, and death be upon all who blaspheme HIM. i read all of your comments; some of you speak wisely, some just shrugged. some depend on human's research. why do we fight over this? why disrespect the government? they're human too, they do what all of us do. that is trying to do things according to what they thought was right. it's human nature, an instinct GOD HIMSELF had given to us, free will. they might have shallow understanding given they are politicians and not religious teachers. but GOD had said to us to obey the government. besides that, do we, puny human really know GOD's name? HE has many names for us to use when we want to pray to HIM. sure we are christians and muslims, but let us not fight about this. it won't glorify GOD the ALMIGHTY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOD&#8217;s name is holy. treat HIS name with respect and avoid yourself from getting into useless arguments. HIS name is very sacred, and death be upon all who blaspheme HIM. i read all of your comments; some of you speak wisely, some just shrugged. some depend on human&#8217;s research. why do we fight over this? why disrespect the government? they&#8217;re human too, they do what all of us do. that is trying to do things according to what they thought was right. it&#8217;s human nature, an instinct GOD HIMSELF had given to us, free will. they might have shallow understanding given they are politicians and not religious teachers. but GOD had said to us to obey the government. besides that, do we, puny human really know GOD&#8217;s name? HE has many names for us to use when we want to pray to HIM. sure we are christians and muslims, but let us not fight about this. it won&#8217;t glorify GOD the ALMIGHTY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Islamic Democracy by Barry L</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/islamic-democracy/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/?p=365#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>Islam, in my opinion, began as a progressive religion that was forward-looking and its dramatic rise in the 7th century showed that it had many attractive qualities. Its call for the strengthening of the community and for its aderents not to be waylaid by materialism are and will always be salient messages.

In the present context of globalisation, Islam as a religion is confronting issues that were anticipated a long time ago. 

Sometimes I feel that religion on its own is timeless, and it is the epoch that determines its value. And every epoch's inhabitants would consider themselves somewhat different in perspective as the epoch before, but fundamentally, religion calls to attention very similar issues that spans across time.

My only gripe is that it is strange for me to think that given a democratic medium such as the Internet, people are still unable to recognise the diversity in the world and assume that there is only one 'truth' and one way to do things.

Islamic democracy is perhaps one of the casualties of people's misunderstanding. Instead of trying to understand what it means and its outcomes, people should first understand the value of it, because value is something that is universal and timeless.

Barry L
http://www.platypuslayegg.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Islam, in my opinion, began as a progressive religion that was forward-looking and its dramatic rise in the 7th century showed that it had many attractive qualities. Its call for the strengthening of the community and for its aderents not to be waylaid by materialism are and will always be salient messages.</p>
<p>In the present context of globalisation, Islam as a religion is confronting issues that were anticipated a long time ago. </p>
<p>Sometimes I feel that religion on its own is timeless, and it is the epoch that determines its value. And every epoch&#8217;s inhabitants would consider themselves somewhat different in perspective as the epoch before, but fundamentally, religion calls to attention very similar issues that spans across time.</p>
<p>My only gripe is that it is strange for me to think that given a democratic medium such as the Internet, people are still unable to recognise the diversity in the world and assume that there is only one &#8216;truth&#8217; and one way to do things.</p>
<p>Islamic democracy is perhaps one of the casualties of people&#8217;s misunderstanding. Instead of trying to understand what it means and its outcomes, people should first understand the value of it, because value is something that is universal and timeless.</p>
<p>Barry L<br />
<a href="http://www.platypuslayegg.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.platypuslayegg.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Egalitaria by Jeffrey Ng</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/about/#comment-4400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/about/#comment-4400</guid>
		<description>Impressed~~ I guess we have all achieved something since college!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressed~~ I guess we have all achieved something since college!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scary Similarities: Malaysia &#38; South Africa by HL</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/scary-similarities-malaysia-south-africa/#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/?p=362#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>And we wonder what the action is really affirming...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And we wonder what the action is really affirming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Islamic Democracy by Dan-yel</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/islamic-democracy/#comment-4398</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan-yel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/?p=365#comment-4398</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"We are afraid to put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason, because we suspect that this stock in each man is small, and that the individuals would do better to avail themselves of the general bank and capital of nations and ages. Many of our men of speculation, instead of exploding general prejudices, employ their sagacity to discover the latent wisdom which prevails in them. If they find what they seek, and they seldom fail, they think it more wise to continue the prejudice, with the reason involved, than to cast away the coat of prejudice, and to leave nothing but naked reason; because prejudice, with its reason, has a motive to give action to that reason, and an affection which will give it permanence."&lt;/i&gt; Edmund Burke on conservatism

I came across it in wikipedia, and it's interesting that he pointed out how, in my view, radical ideas, no matter how enlightened could amount to bad governance.

What has happened in Iraq is the result of American prejudice with respect to Middle East, similarly to the nation's confrontational approach to China, in which its people are virtually unanimously sympathetic to the cause of their government.

The problem that the world has with the Islam religion may be that due to our treating it as a 'religion'. 'Religion' to me denotes a somewhat political belonging to a community of common belief and sets of values. Thus, one community would view another community with a set of our prejudices, we find it uncomfortable to approach them, and we judge them through the lens of our values, true to our primitive instinct that served us well in the past to protect our resources from competitors of different tribe.

But humanity has gone so far, and it cannot afford to subject itself to such primitive nature and aim to move beyond that prejudicial bubble. It's time for us to realise that 'religion' was a new concept, a concept that serves to justify one community ownership to a set of intellectual ideas against another, a concept that arises as a way to identify one as different from another, and an instinctive reaction to the encroaching of foreign civilisation. Islam should be viewed instead as a philosophy, perhaps it's possible even to merge all so-called 'religions'.

The world is getting more globalised, and this whole world, a population of 6 billion, must be seen as one whole small village. 'Village' in a sense that how in the primitive times, humans identify themselves with fellow villagers, and different or even as different from the other village.

Islam, has been victimised into a rigid dogmatic religion, I do not think that was so intended in the first place. I think it was meant to be a spiritual-political change for Arabia, and perhaps Muhammad's answer to change the whole world for the better. Perhaps Islam wasn't about its rituals or membership, perhaps Islam was so universal that it's about its aim for justice, reconciliation of humanity themselves and with transcendent common nature, God, even to the extent that maybe we are actually all Muslims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;We are afraid to put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason, because we suspect that this stock in each man is small, and that the individuals would do better to avail themselves of the general bank and capital of nations and ages. Many of our men of speculation, instead of exploding general prejudices, employ their sagacity to discover the latent wisdom which prevails in them. If they find what they seek, and they seldom fail, they think it more wise to continue the prejudice, with the reason involved, than to cast away the coat of prejudice, and to leave nothing but naked reason; because prejudice, with its reason, has a motive to give action to that reason, and an affection which will give it permanence.&#8221;</i> Edmund Burke on conservatism</p>
<p>I came across it in wikipedia, and it&#8217;s interesting that he pointed out how, in my view, radical ideas, no matter how enlightened could amount to bad governance.</p>
<p>What has happened in Iraq is the result of American prejudice with respect to Middle East, similarly to the nation&#8217;s confrontational approach to China, in which its people are virtually unanimously sympathetic to the cause of their government.</p>
<p>The problem that the world has with the Islam religion may be that due to our treating it as a &#8216;religion&#8217;. &#8216;Religion&#8217; to me denotes a somewhat political belonging to a community of common belief and sets of values. Thus, one community would view another community with a set of our prejudices, we find it uncomfortable to approach them, and we judge them through the lens of our values, true to our primitive instinct that served us well in the past to protect our resources from competitors of different tribe.</p>
<p>But humanity has gone so far, and it cannot afford to subject itself to such primitive nature and aim to move beyond that prejudicial bubble. It&#8217;s time for us to realise that &#8216;religion&#8217; was a new concept, a concept that serves to justify one community ownership to a set of intellectual ideas against another, a concept that arises as a way to identify one as different from another, and an instinctive reaction to the encroaching of foreign civilisation. Islam should be viewed instead as a philosophy, perhaps it&#8217;s possible even to merge all so-called &#8216;religions&#8217;.</p>
<p>The world is getting more globalised, and this whole world, a population of 6 billion, must be seen as one whole small village. &#8216;Village&#8217; in a sense that how in the primitive times, humans identify themselves with fellow villagers, and different or even as different from the other village.</p>
<p>Islam, has been victimised into a rigid dogmatic religion, I do not think that was so intended in the first place. I think it was meant to be a spiritual-political change for Arabia, and perhaps Muhammad&#8217;s answer to change the whole world for the better. Perhaps Islam wasn&#8217;t about its rituals or membership, perhaps Islam was so universal that it&#8217;s about its aim for justice, reconciliation of humanity themselves and with transcendent common nature, God, even to the extent that maybe we are actually all Muslims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Allah, Tuhan, God, Shang-Ti, Dio! by michael sibinil</title>
		<link>http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/allah-tuhan-god-shang-ti-dio/#comment-4396</link>
		<dc:creator>michael sibinil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egalitaria.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/allah-tuhan-god-shang-ti-dio/#comment-4396</guid>
		<description>William,

I am inclined to believe  that you are  pagan worshiper of the demonic, satanic, folklore,  legendary mystical false god called KINORINGAN who hypothetically begat a daughter called HUMINODUN. If this is what the likes of you (I suppose every member of the KDCA is included in this group) declare to believe in...., then by your admission to the affirmative...., this pagan god called KINORINGAN is your "father" and your "savior". 

For you and all other advocates of KINORINGAN to be saved......, you have no choice but to renounce this demon god which you called your "god". Every religion has a "god". Even atheism in itself is a religion; it has a god called "evolution". Lest you argue that an idea cannot be referred to as a "god", how do you explain the verse where Jesus Christ referred to "money" (or mammon) as a "god"?

The Jesus Christ of the Christian Bible has said:  "I AM THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE...." and that "NO ONE COMES TO ME SAVE MY FATHER BRINGS HIM TO ME..". 

Pilgrim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,</p>
<p>I am inclined to believe  that you are  pagan worshiper of the demonic, satanic, folklore,  legendary mystical false god called KINORINGAN who hypothetically begat a daughter called HUMINODUN. If this is what the likes of you (I suppose every member of the KDCA is included in this group) declare to believe in&#8230;., then by your admission to the affirmative&#8230;., this pagan god called KINORINGAN is your &#8220;father&#8221; and your &#8220;savior&#8221;. </p>
<p>For you and all other advocates of KINORINGAN to be saved&#8230;&#8230;, you have no choice but to renounce this demon god which you called your &#8220;god&#8221;. Every religion has a &#8220;god&#8221;. Even atheism in itself is a religion; it has a god called &#8220;evolution&#8221;. Lest you argue that an idea cannot be referred to as a &#8220;god&#8221;, how do you explain the verse where Jesus Christ referred to &#8220;money&#8221; (or mammon) as a &#8220;god&#8221;?</p>
<p>The Jesus Christ of the Christian Bible has said:  &#8220;I AM THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE&#8230;.&#8221; and that &#8220;NO ONE COMES TO ME SAVE MY FATHER BRINGS HIM TO ME..&#8221;. </p>
<p>Pilgrim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
